 |
當前位置:評價網(wǎng) > 大學排行榜 > 評價與管理 季刊 > 2010-第4期 > 正文 |
|
||||
|
||||
【摘 要】隨著科學計量學和科研評價實踐的發(fā)展，以h指數(shù)為代表的學術影響力評價指標不斷發(fā)展完善，諸多學者對其與以影響因子為代表的傳統(tǒng)計量學指標的相關性進行了研究。然而很多或未嚴格考慮研究對象的一致性（如期刊在相同時間區(qū)域的載文），或未考慮跨學科比較的差異性等。本研究選擇JCR 2009年版收錄的心臟與心血管系統(tǒng)學科下的期刊為對象，統(tǒng)計各期刊的載文量、總被引次數(shù)、影響因子、特征因子、h指數(shù)和相對h指數(shù)6個指標數(shù)據(jù)，并對其進行相關性分析，從而了解醫(yī)學領域某一細分學科學術影響力指標之間的相互關系，以期為實際應用時提供理論基礎與事實依據(jù)。
【關鍵詞】期刊h指數(shù)；相對h指數(shù)；特征因子；學術影響力；相關性分析
【中圖分類號】G40
The Relationship Analysis among Academic Influence Evaluation Indicators: Based on the perspective of a specific discipline in medical field.
Du Jian，Zhang Bin
(Institute of Medical information, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100020, China)
Abstract：With the development of scientometrics and scientific evaluation practice, the academic influence evaluation indicators represented by h-index continued to evolve, and were compared with the traditional bibliometrics evaluation indicators such as impact factor by many scholars. However, many of those studies didn’t consider the consistency of sample(such as journal papers in the same time zone).This paper selected all journals of Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systems included by JCR 2009, and gathered statistics of journal papers, total citation counts, impact factor, eigenfactor, h-index, and relative h-index as well as the relationship among them, so as to understand the relationship between indicators in specific discipline and to provide theoretical foundation and basis for the practical application.
Keywords: journals h-index; relative h-index; eigenfactor; academic influence; correlation analysis
【查看全文pdf文檔】友情提示：文件較大，如無法直接打開，請點右鍵，再點目標另存為，下載到本地查看。 |
||||
| 【中國科教評價網(wǎng)m.say1888.cn《評價與管理》季刊文章，轉載請注明出處】 |
| [發(fā)布者：qiuyu] | ||
相關閱讀：
·大會執(zhí)行主席、武漢大學副校長謝紅星教授致歡迎辭
·中國科學學與科技政策研究會常務副理事長張碧暉教授講話
·華中師范大學副校長楊宗凱教授致辭
·國際科學計量學與信息計量學學會（ISSI）主席Prof. Ronald Rousseau講話
·關于我國高等教育形勢與中長期發(fā)展規(guī)劃的幾個問題
|
網(wǎng)友評論:(只顯示最新5條。評論內(nèi)容只代表網(wǎng)友觀點，與本站立場無關！)
